BNB Chain prioritizes sustainable business models over gas fee cuts

For half a decade, blockchain networks have been locked in a race to the bottom on gas fees. BNB Chain just stepped off the track.

Nina Rong, BNB Chain’s Growth Director, said on September 6 that the network’s priority is no longer reducing transaction costs. Instead, she argued the industry needs to build sustainable business models that incorporate gas fees, revenue sharing, and commercial agreements, essentially the boring-but-necessary financial plumbing that keeps infrastructure projects alive long-term.

The fee wars are over, apparently

BNB Chain has been one of the more aggressive fee cutters in the space. The network slashed gas costs to as low as 0.05 Gwei and achieved reductions exceeding 90% over historical trends.

But Rong’s message was clear: the next five years should look nothing like the last five. The emphasis needs to shift away from grants and fee reductions toward structures that actually generate revenue.

Her comments landed in the middle of a heated debate about Robinhood Chain’s transaction costs. The newly launched chain has drawn criticism for fees that can peak around $0.40 per transaction. But Robinhood Chain has a counterargument: it shares approximately 10% of its net revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem, directing 8% to the DAO treasury and 2% toward development initiatives.

What this means for the competitive landscape

Robinhood Chain’s revenue-sharing model with Arbitrum offers one template. By allocating a fixed percentage of net revenue back to the broader ecosystem, it creates alignment between the chain’s commercial success and the health of the network it builds on. The 8% DAO treasury allocation and 2% development fund split give stakeholders a direct financial interest in the chain’s transaction volume rather than just its token price.

For BNB Chain specifically, the pivot makes strategic sense. The network has already captured significant market share through years of aggressive fee cuts. Continuing to slash prices offers diminishing returns.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.