1 hour ago
20
The European Union sanctioned several Israeli settlers accused of violence against Palestinians and 10 Hamas leaders on May 11, with measures including travel bans and asset freezes.
EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas announced the agreement, which breaks what had been a prolonged stalemate in EU foreign policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“It was high time we moved from deadlock to delivery,” Kallas said.
The deadlock had largely been attributed to Hungary’s repeated objections to sanctioning Israeli settlers.
The crypto connection is not theoretical
Hamas has solicited cryptocurrency donations since at least 2019, making this sanctions package directly relevant to the digital asset industry. The group’s use of crypto for fundraising is well-documented, and US authorities disrupted Hamas-linked crypto networks as recently as March 2025.
Chainalysis reported $154 billion in illicit crypto activity in 2025, which included a 694% increase in state-driven sanctions evasion using cryptocurrency.
Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer by market cap, has already been cooperating with authorities on this front. The company froze wallet addresses linked to Hamas as part of counter-terror financing efforts.
What this means for European crypto exchanges
The EU’s sanctions arrive against the backdrop of an already-evolving regulatory environment in Europe. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework has been reshaping how exchanges operate across the bloc. Adding counterterrorism-specific sanctions enforcement on top of existing anti-money laundering requirements creates a compliance burden that is growing in both cost and complexity.
Israeli cryptocurrency projects could feel the geopolitical tremors more directly. Bancor and COTI, two notable blockchain projects with Israeli roots, are meaningful components of the regional digital economy.
The bigger picture for crypto regulation
The 694% increase in sanctions evasion via crypto reported by Chainalysis provides empirical ammunition for those arguing that digital assets require more aggressive oversight, particularly in the context of terrorism financing and sanctions enforcement.
The EU’s move may accelerate efforts to introduce specific regulations addressing crypto-related terror financing, distinct from the broader MiCA framework.
For market participants, the practical takeaway is that demand for blockchain analytics and compliance infrastructure is likely to increase. Companies like Chainalysis, Elliptic, and TRM Labs stand to benefit from a regulatory environment that essentially mandates their services.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·