Five years is a long time to miss a target. Thomas Barkin, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, made that point bluntly on May 21, 2026, noting that inflation has sat above the Fed’s 2% goal for more than half a decade.
Barkin’s concern is less about any single month’s data and more about what persistent overshoot does to expectations. When businesses and consumers stop believing that prices will eventually settle back toward 2%, they start behaving accordingly, demanding higher wages, pre-emptively raising prices, and locking in contracts that embed inflation rather than resist it.
The numbers behind the worry
Headline PCE, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, came in at 3.5% as of March 2026. Core PCE, which strips out food and energy to give a cleaner read on underlying price trends, stood at 3.7% by mid-August 2026. Both figures sit nearly twice the Fed’s stated target.
Barkin traced the origins of the problem to a chain of supply shocks: first the COVID-19 pandemic, then Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and more recently the knock-on effects of shifting tariff policies. Each disruption alone might have been manageable. Stacked on top of one another across several years, they have created an inflationary backdrop that demand-side tools, meaning rate hikes, were not designed to fully address.
Barkin acknowledged this tension directly. Whether current interest rates are actually restrictive enough remains, in his words, “still an open question.”
Why this matters beyond the Fed’s meeting room
The challenge for Barkin and his colleagues is that they are being asked to use a blunt instrument, the federal funds rate, against a problem that has multiple roots. Geopolitical risk cannot be rate-hiked away. Tariff-driven cost increases do not respond to tighter credit conditions. What the Fed can do is anchor expectations, making clear that it will not allow temporary supply-side shocks to permanently reset the inflation baseline.
Markets are watching Barkin’s tone carefully for clues about the timing and direction of future rate moves. Elevated core PCE at 3.7% makes a near-term rate cut difficult to justify publicly, even if growth data were to soften. At the same time, Barkin’s refusal to endorse further hikes as a certainty suggests the Fed sees itself in a holding pattern, waiting for more data before committing to either direction.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

1 hour ago
19






English (US) ·