1 hour ago
19
A federal trial now underway in Oakland, California, could produce one of the largest corporate penalties in American history. Four US states are demanding up to $1.4 trillion from Meta Platforms, alleging the company deliberately engineered Facebook and Instagram to be addictive for children and teenagers.
To put that number in perspective, Meta’s entire market capitalization sits at roughly $1.5 trillion. The states are essentially asking a court to fine Meta an amount equal to nearly all of its market value.
What the states are actually alleging
California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey are the four states bringing the case, led by their respective attorneys general: Rob Bonta, Phil Weiser, Russell Coleman, and Jennifer Davenport. Their core argument is straightforward, even if the underlying mechanics are complex.
The states claim Meta purposefully designed platform features, including infinite scroll and like buttons, to maximize the time young users spend on its apps. Not as an accident of good product design, but as a deliberate strategy to boost engagement metrics and, by extension, advertising revenue.
The plaintiffs tie these design choices to a cascade of mental health consequences among young users: anxiety, depression, and body image problems. They argue Meta knew about these risks and actively misled the public about them.
There’s also a separate but related legal thread involving the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, better known as COPPA. The states allege Meta collected data from children under 13 without proper authorization, a violation of the federal law designed specifically to protect minors online.
The trial is expected to last six to seven weeks, meaning a verdict likely won’t arrive until sometime in the fall.
The tobacco playbook, applied to social media
Legal observers have drawn comparisons between this case and the landmark lawsuits against tobacco companies in the 1990s, as well as the more recent opioid litigation. In 1998, the four largest US tobacco companies agreed to a master settlement of $206 billion paid over 25 years.
Among the specific remedies the plaintiffs are seeking, beyond the monetary penalties, are structural changes to Meta’s products. These include eliminating infinite scrolling for young users and enforcing stricter age verification requirements.
The plaintiffs intend to utilize both company documents and prior legal outcomes, such as a recent jury verdict in New Mexico that resulted in a $375 million award against similar claims, to bolster their argument.
What’s at stake beyond the courtroom
The financial exposure alone makes this trial consequential, but the regulatory implications could prove even more significant. A ruling against Meta would establish new legal precedent for holding social media companies liable for the design of their platforms, not just the content hosted on them.
That distinction matters enormously. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has long shielded tech companies from liability for user-generated content. But this case takes a different approach, targeting the product design decisions themselves. Infinite scroll isn’t content. Like buttons aren’t speech. They’re engineering choices, and the states are arguing those choices should carry legal consequences when they foreseeably harm children.
The multistate lawsuit against Meta emerged in 2023, driven by a coalition of 29 attorneys general scrutinizing the impacts of social media design on minors’ mental health. The Oakland federal trial became the first to reach a significant resolution in this extensive litigation, with four states advancing claims focused on consumer protection and violations of COPPA.
Meta has countered these allegations, asserting that the lawsuit’s claims are unfounded and that the proposed penalties far exceed any historical precedents in consumer protection enforcement.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·