Iran’s Economic Commission member suggests reevaluation of nuclear stance amid US military pressure

For decades, Iran’s official position on nuclear weapons has been simple: we don’t want them, we won’t build them, and there’s a religious edict to prove it. That position is starting to crack, at least rhetorically.

Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for Iran’s parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, warned on July 8 that a new all-out attack by the United States could push Tehran to reconsider its nuclear doctrine entirely. He went further, suggesting Iran might withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the foundational agreement that has governed global nuclear restraint since 1968.

A week of escalating rhetoric

Rezaei’s comments didn’t arrive in a vacuum. Five days earlier, on July 3, the same official pointed to Israeli threats against Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as a legitimate reason to revisit Iran’s approach to nuclear weapons.

He’s not alone in this framing. Hossein Samsami, a member of Iran’s Economic Commission, described the country’s current predicament on July 9 as an “existential war” that demands a fresh look at nuclear posture.

Iran’s rejection of nuclear weapons has historically rested on a fatwa issued by the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. What’s shifting now is the willingness of senior officials to publicly question whether that shield is sufficient.

The military backdrop

These statements land against a backdrop of sustained military action. US and Israeli strikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025, followed by another round in February 2026.

US intelligence assessments have consistently indicated that Iran has not pursued active weaponization of its nuclear program.

The NPT withdrawal threat adds another dimension. North Korea withdrew from the treaty in 2003 and tested its first nuclear device three years later.

Parliamentary rhetoric versus policy reality

It’s worth noting who is doing the talking. Rezaei and Samsami are parliamentary figures, not members of the Supreme National Security Council or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Iran’s actual nuclear policy decisions flow through a much smaller circle of power, ultimately terminating with the Supreme Leader.

Mojtaba Khamenei, who succeeded his father as Supreme Leader, has not publicly reaffirmed or modified the ruling in the current context of sustained military strikes.

What this means for regional stability

Iran sits on roughly 10% of the world’s proven oil reserves, and any escalation that disrupts production or transit through the Strait of Hormuz would send crude prices surging. The February 2026 strikes already produced short-term price spikes.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.