Solana votes to cancel 19M SOL in cliffhanger decision

Solana just passed a vote that will prevent roughly 18.9 million SOL from ever being minted. The margin of victory? Comfortable on paper, dramatic in practice, with a single exchange validator swinging the outcome in the final stretch.

SGP-0002, the proposal to double Solana’s annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%, cleared the two-thirds threshold with 67% support. That translates to 176.29 million SOL voting in favor, 66.19 million against, and 20.63 million choosing to abstain. The vote drew participation from about 60.7% of the roughly 433.5 million staked SOL, easily clearing the one-third quorum requirement.

What the vote actually changes

Solana’s inflation model works on a schedule. The network started with a set inflation rate that decreases by a fixed percentage each year, a mechanism called disinflation, until it reaches a terminal floor of 1.5%. Under the old 15% annual disinflation rate, that floor wouldn’t arrive until roughly 2032.

With SGP-0002 now approved, that timeline compresses dramatically. The 30% disinflation rate means Solana is projected to hit its 1.5% terminal inflation rate by the first half of 2029, shaving nearly three years off the original schedule.

Over a six-year window, the change will result in approximately 18.9 million fewer SOL tokens entering circulation compared to the previous issuance plan. That represents a supply reduction of about 2.6% relative to what would have existed under the old model.

The Kraken swing vote

The final tally looks decisive, but the journey there was anything but. Kraken’s validator moved 8.1 million SOL in favor of the proposal in a late swing that proved pivotal to the outcome.

The dynamics underscore a tension that will define Solana governance going forward. Validators and stakers earn rewards from inflation. Reducing issuance means smaller staking yields over time. Token holders who don’t stake, meanwhile, benefit from less dilution. The vote essentially asked validators to vote against their own short-term economic interest in favor of a tighter long-term supply.

Solana’s governance debut

SGP-0002 wasn’t the only item on the ballot. This was Solana’s inaugural formal on-chain governance vote, and the network put three proposals to its validators simultaneously.

SGP-0001, which established the Solana Constitution formalizing governance rules for future decisions, sailed through with roughly 95% support.

SGP-0003, a fee restructuring proposal, garnered only about 54% support, falling well short of the two-thirds supermajority required for passage. The rejection signals that while validators are willing to accept reduced inflation rewards, they drew the line at restructuring how transaction fees flow through the network.

What this means for SOL’s economics

As inflation decreases faster, the nominal rewards for staking SOL will decline more quickly. Currently, staking yields are derived primarily from inflation, with transaction fees contributing a smaller share. If the fee restructuring proposal (SGP-0003) had also passed, the network might have offset some of that yield compression. Its failure means stakers will feel the squeeze sooner.

For validators specifically, the math gets tighter. Operating a Solana validator requires significant infrastructure investment, and reduced staking rewards could push smaller operators toward consolidation or exit. That’s a centralization risk the community will need to monitor as the new disinflation rate takes effect.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.