The Federal Reserve has a measurement problem, and at least one of its top officials is saying the quiet part out loud.
Mary C. Daly, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, is pushing for improved monitoring of inflation and labor market data. The catch: she wants better inputs without changing the standards those inputs are measured against. The Fed’s 2% inflation target and dual mandate stay exactly where they are.
The data quality dilemma
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh put a finer point on this issue on July 1, calling for improved real-time economic data to address what he described as “mismeasurement problems.” Daly’s comments dovetail with that perspective, suggesting a growing consensus within the Fed’s leadership that the toolkit needs modernizing.
The numbers tell the story of why this matters right now. PCE inflation, the Fed’s preferred gauge, is running around 2.8-2.9%. CPI sits near 2.7%. Both remain stubbornly above the 2% target, but the gap is narrow enough that data precision becomes critical. A few tenths of a percentage point in either direction could mean the difference between holding rates steady and making a move.
On the labor side, unemployment has settled into a range of 4.3-4.4%. The market has stabilized, but it’s softer than peak post-pandemic tightness.
Better tools, same rules
What makes Daly’s position notable is its restraint. Her argument is surgical: the framework is fine, but the information feeding into it needs to be sharper. Changing the target would be a seismic shift that markets would need to reprice around. Improving data collection and integration is more like a software update, meaningful but non-disruptive.
Throughout June 2026, Daly maintained a busy schedule of public engagements focused on data-driven policymaking. During a June 4 event, she addressed the limited impact of AI on inflation, suggesting that while artificial intelligence is transforming many sectors, its deflationary effects haven’t materialized in the data yet.
What this means for markets and crypto
Consider the Fed’s track record during the post-pandemic inflation surge. Policymakers famously called inflation “transitory” in part because the data they were relying on lagged the real economy by months. Better real-time indicators might have prompted an earlier response, potentially avoiding the aggressive hiking cycle that followed.
With inflation still running above target at 2.7-2.9%, the Fed has reason to maintain a relatively hawkish posture. But if improved data were to show inflation cooling faster than current indicators suggest, it could open the door to easing sooner than markets expect.
For crypto specifically, the Daly discussion hasn’t drawn much attention from industry-native publications. The Fed’s data infrastructure decisions have downstream effects on everything from stablecoin regulation to how digital asset markets respond to macro signals.
Investors should watch for concrete steps toward implementing new data frameworks in the coming months, with a timeline for better data integration estimated at 9-12 months.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

1 hour ago
18









English (US) ·