US judge dismisses criminal case against Gautam Adani

A US federal judge has dismissed the criminal case against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, ending a legal saga that began with a 2024 indictment accusing him of orchestrating a massive bribery scheme tied to solar energy contracts in India.

The dismissal came after the Department of Justice itself moved to drop all charges against Adani and his co-defendants, arguing that the alleged misconduct was fundamentally foreign in nature.

From indictment to dismissal in 18 months

The original indictment landed in December 2024, charging Adani and seven other executives from the Adani Group with securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy related to a bribery scheme worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Prosecutors alleged that the defendants had deceived US investors and government officials to secure contracts for a solar power project in India.

Around May 18, 2026, the DOJ filed a motion to dismiss all charges. The justification: the alleged criminal conduct happened overseas, making it a poor fit for US prosecution. Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the Eastern District of New York ordered the government to provide more thorough reasoning by July 13, finding the DOJ’s initial filings insufficiently detailed.

US Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. for Brooklyn confirmed as of July 17, 2026, that he lacked the authority to dispute the DOJ’s decision to withdraw the prosecution. With no one left to argue for keeping the case alive, the dismissal went through.

Adani’s defense and the investment question

Throughout the proceedings, Adani maintained his innocence. He submitted a sworn affidavit denying any quid pro quo connected to his reported $10 billion investment pledge in the United States. The DOJ stated that its decision to drop the case was not linked to Adani’s investment commitments.

Federal judges typically defer to prosecutors on charging decisions. Garaufis’s insistence on detailed justification reflected the sensitivity of the case, and by demanding specificity, he created a public record of why the government chose to walk away.

What the dismissal signals

Dropping a case because the alleged conduct was “foreign in nature” is a notable departure from decades of aggressive Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement. During previous administrations, these statutes were used to hold accountable anyone who used US capital markets or financial infrastructure to facilitate corruption, regardless of where the bribes were paid.

For US investors who held positions in Adani Group entities during the indictment period, the dismissal removes one source of uncertainty. Adani Group’s publicly traded companies experienced significant volatility after the initial charges were filed.

Congressional Democrats have already signaled interest in investigating the circumstances surrounding the dismissal.

The Adani Group continues to expand across energy, ports, airports, and digital infrastructure. With criminal charges no longer hanging over its founder, the conglomerate enters its next chapter with significantly less legal overhang.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.