1 hour ago
31
When the world’s biggest tech companies go shopping for places to park their AI ambitions, they apparently want sunshine, political stability, and an English-speaking workforce. Australia checks all three boxes, and AirTrunk, the country’s dominant hyperscale data center operator, is positioning itself as the landlord of choice.
AirTrunk CEO Robin Khuda has described the current wave of AI infrastructure buildout as “the biggest gold rush in human history.” His company, valued at roughly A$24 billion after a Blackstone-led consortium acquired it in 2024, is betting that Australia can capture a disproportionate share of that gold.
The scale of the buildout
AirTrunk’s total operational capacity across its five Australian campuses now exceeds 1.2 GW.
The company’s latest project, the MEL2 campus in Melbourne announced in December 2025, will deliver over 354 MW of capacity. The price tag: more than A$5 billion in investment for a single campus.
Meanwhile, AirTrunk’s SYD3 project in Sydney is targeting over 400 MW, with A$4.3 billion in loan talks reportedly underway to finance the build.
The client roster reads like a who’s who of Silicon Valley. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Apple, and Oracle are all among AirTrunk’s major US tech clients, each hungry for capacity in the Asia-Pacific region.
Why Australia, specifically
Tech companies have made loud, public commitments to sustainability. Australia’s abundant solar and wind resources offer a credible path to powering data centers with clean energy, which matters both for corporate ESG targets and for the long-term economics of energy procurement.
AirTrunk has already put this into practice. A 25 MW Mulwala Solar Farm in New South Wales, backed by both Google and AirTrunk under a power purchase agreement signed in 2023, is nearing grid connection.
Geography is the second advantage. Australia sits at the doorstep of Asian markets that represent billions of potential cloud and AI users. For US tech companies trying to serve customers across the Asia-Pacific without building in jurisdictions that carry geopolitical risk, Australia offers a rare combination of proximity and predictability.
The obstacles in the way
Australia’s planning and permitting processes are slow, lagging behind comparable timelines in Asia by roughly two years according to industry assessments. When you’re in what Khuda calls a gold rush, a two-year head start for competitors in Singapore or Japan is a meaningful disadvantage.
Grid constraints present another challenge. Building a 354 MW data center is one thing. Actually connecting it to a power grid that can reliably deliver that electricity is another. Australia’s transmission infrastructure wasn’t designed with hyperscale data centers in mind, and upgrading it takes time and coordination between federal, state, and private stakeholders.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·