White House: Stablecoin yield ban would boost bank lending by just 0.02%

The White House just made the banking lobby’s worst argument look even worse. A new report from the Council of Economic Advisers concludes that banning yield payments on stablecoins would increase total US bank lending by a grand total of $2.1 billion, or about 0.02% of outstanding loans.

The numbers behind the non-threat

The CEA’s analysis, released on September 15, modeled what would happen if stablecoin holders were stripped of the ability to earn yield on their holdings. The theory, championed by groups like the Independent Community Bankers of America, goes something like this: stablecoins offering competitive returns are siphoning deposits away from traditional banks, which in turn reduces their capacity to lend to Main Street businesses and homebuyers.

The report estimates that roughly $54.4 billion, about 18.1% of the approximately $300 billion stablecoin market, might shift into bank deposits if yield were prohibited. Most stablecoin reserves are already parked in Treasuries and similar safe assets, meaning those funds are already circulating within the broader financial system. The CEA found that the net effect on actual loan origination would be negligible.

Community banks, the institutions most frequently cited as vulnerable to stablecoin competition, would see lending increase by approximately $500 million. That represents 0.026% of their total loan portfolios.

Consumer costs dwarf any lending gains

The CEA estimated that prohibiting stablecoin yields would impose a net annual welfare cost of $800 million on consumers. The ratio of consumer losses to lending benefits works out to 6.6 to 1.

The report did model extreme scenarios where the impact could be substantially larger. Under conditions where the stablecoin market grows to six times its current size, reserves are held entirely in cash that banks can’t otherwise access, and consumers dramatically shift their behavior toward yield-bearing products, lending could theoretically increase by up to $531 billion, or 4.4% of outstanding loans. The CEA’s own assessment: those conditions are unrealistic.

Timing and legislative context

The report’s release landed just ahead of Senate action on the pending CLARITY Act, legislation that could shape how stablecoins are regulated for years to come. The findings build on an earlier CEA paper from April 2026 that reached similar conclusions about the minimal impact of yield prohibitions.

The legislative backdrop includes the GENIUS Act, which passed in 2025 and mandated that stablecoin issuers maintain one-to-one reserves in safe assets like Treasuries and cash equivalents. The Independent Community Bankers of America has been among the most vocal advocates for yield restrictions, arguing that small banks face an uneven playing field when competing against digital dollar products that can offer returns traditional savings accounts struggle to match. The CEA’s analysis directly challenges that framing, suggesting the competitive threat has been substantially overstated.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.