1 hour ago
13
BlackRock was on the verge of losing one of the largest public pension mandates in the country. Now it gets another shot.
New York City Comptroller Mark Levine announced on June 12 an open rebidding process for approximately $42.3B in US public equity index mandates across three major city pension systems. The move effectively gives BlackRock a fresh opportunity to compete for contracts that, just months earlier, city officials had recommended terminating over climate concerns.
The three pension systems in question, NYCERS, TRS, and BERS, are part of a broader portfolio that collectively manages nearly $300B in assets.
From recommended termination to open competition
In November 2025, then-Comptroller Brad Lander recommended rebidding BlackRock’s mandates after concluding the firm’s decarbonization plans were inadequate. Of 49 public-market managers assessed at the time, 46 submitted decarbonization plans that aligned with the pension systems’ expectations. BlackRock was not among the 46.
An April 30 follow-up assessment doubled down on the finding. Both BlackRock and Fidelity were flagged as misaligned with the climate expectations outlined by the pension systems. The city’s standards emphasize science-based targets and robust engagement policies.
Levine took over as comptroller and chose a different approach. Rather than outright termination, he initiated a broad rebidding process. BlackRock can compete alongside other firms for the same mandates it was about to lose.
NYC’s climate track record adds context
Since 2019, the city’s pension systems have achieved a 37% reduction in financed emissions. They’ve also deployed over $15B into climate-focused investments. New York City’s five pension systems have actively pursued aggressive net-zero implementation policies since 2023, committing to a full divestment from fossil fuel reserve owners and exiting approximately $3.8B worth of such investments.
What this means for investors
The fact that 46 out of 49 managers met NYC’s climate standards suggests the bar isn’t impossibly high. It suggests BlackRock, despite its scale and resources, made a strategic choice about how aggressively to pursue decarbonization, and that choice had consequences.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·