Paramount’s $111B takeover of Warner Bros wins US antitrust approval

The US Department of Justice just gave the green light to a deal that will reshape Hollywood as we know it. Paramount Skydance’s $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, debt included, cleared the DOJ’s Antitrust Division on June 12, marking the removal of the single biggest regulatory obstacle standing between these two entertainment giants and their merger.

Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders will receive $31 in cash per share. The combined entity is expected to become one of the most formidable forces in both traditional media and the streaming wars that have defined the entertainment industry for the past half-decade.

How the deal came together

Paramount and Skydance signed a definitive agreement back in February 2026, setting the terms that would govern one of the most consequential media transactions in recent memory.

Shareholder approval came on April 23. Bondholder consent followed in May, clearing the financial architecture needed to support a deal of this magnitude.

Netflix reportedly showed interest in competing bids during the acquisition process, with Paramount emerging as the frontrunner. The merger is now expected to close in Q3 2026, pending additional regulatory clearances.

What’s left standing in the way

Two significant regulatory threads remain unresolved. First, state attorneys general could file lawsuits challenging the merger on competitive grounds. Second, the European Union still has its own review process underway, with particular focus on foreign subsidies regulations.

What this means for investors

The $31-per-share cash offer gives WBD shareholders a clean exit. The AT&T and Time Warner marriage, which eventually unwound with the spinoff of Warner Bros. Discovery itself, stands as a cautionary tale of how combining assets on paper doesn’t always translate to operational synergy.

The Q3 2026 expected closing means several months of uncertainty remain. EU regulatory review and potential state-level legal challenges could delay the timeline or impose conditions that alter the deal’s economics.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.