US called on to unfreeze $43–44M in Belarusian Citibank funds amid diplomatic talks

The US has called on banks to release Belarus’s frozen assets, a significant concession that comes as Special Envoy John Coale returned to Minsk on September 15 for the first face-to-face diplomatic talks with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in six months.

At the center of the dispute: roughly $43 to $44 million in Belarusian funds sitting in a Citibank account, frozen under US sanctions. Lukashenko made it clear on September 11 that those funds need to move before any deeper negotiations can happen.

The money and the leverage

Sanctions on Belarusian banks, including Belinvestbank, were lifted in two rounds: first in December 2025, then again in March 2026.

Those earlier moves came in exchange for something concrete: the release of political prisoners. Hundreds of detainees have walked free since negotiations began in 2025.

Roughly 900 political prisoners remain in Belarusian custody.

Why Belarus matters beyond politics

Before the 2021 sanctions regime took hold, Belarus accounted for about 20% of global potassium chloride exports. When those exports were disrupted, fertilizer prices spiked globally, contributing to food price inflation that hit developing nations especially hard.

The US decision to lift sanctions on certain Belarusian potash producers earlier in the negotiation process was partly an acknowledgment of this reality.

Coale’s diplomatic balancing act

Lukashenko’s public demand for the Citibank funds four days before Coale’s arrival was almost certainly not coincidental. It was a signal, both to Washington and to his domestic audience, that Belarus would not be making concessions without receiving tangible economic benefits in return.

The prisoner releases achieved so far represent real progress. Hundreds of people are free who otherwise would not be. The question is whether unfreezing $43 to $44 million and further easing financial restrictions will accelerate additional releases or simply reward Lukashenko without securing proportional commitments.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.